Earlier this week, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled on a monumental DWI case that had the potential to drastically change the approach police officers could take during DWI arrests.  After the decision, law enforcement officers must get a warrant before ordering a blood test on an unwilling drunken-driving suspect except during special circumstances when the delay could threaten a life or destroy potential evidence.

The simple fact that alcohol in the blood begins dissipating when a person stops drinking does not qualify as such a circumstance.  The Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the defendant was subjected to an unconstitutional search when a hospital employee drew his blood on orders from a Missouri State Highway Patrol trooper. The Trooper did not get a warrant once the defendant refused a road-side breath test.

The Missouri Supreme Court ruled that there must be “exigent circumstances under which the time needed to obtain a warrant would endanger life, allow a suspect to escape or risk the destruction of evidence.”  In upholding the trial judge’s suppression of the blood-sample, the court stated that “Defendant’s case is unquestionably a routine DWI case.”

The Cape Girardeau prosecuting attorney’s office stated that they plan to appeal the case to the United States Supreme Court.

**The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.**

**Past results do not serve as a guarantee of future results.**

**The information on this St. Louis DWI website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.**